                                      National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies

                                                              Table 9.8

                                   Program Impacts on Child Care-Related Work Attendance for
                 Employment at Interview for All Sample Members and for Those Employed at Interview

                                                  Sample Program Control Difference   Percentage
Site and Program                                    Size   Group   Group   (Impact)   Change (%)

                                                           A. For All Sample Members
Missed or late for work at interview (%)

Atlanta Labor Force Attachment                      1890     5.6     6.9    -1.2        -18.0       prbempai
Atlanta Human Capital Development                   2199     8.0     6.9     1.1         16.7       prbempai

Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment                 1158    12.7    10.9     1.8         16.5       prbempai
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development              1158    10.3    10.9    -0.5         -5.0       prbempai

Riverside Labor Force Attachment                    1678     8.6     5.8     2.8 **      48.3       prbempai
  Lacked high school diploma or basic skills        1012     7.6     3.6     3.9 ***    109.6       prbempai
Riverside Human Capital Development                 1350     7.8     3.6     4.2 ***    116.9       prbempai

Columbus Integrated                                  728    10.9    10.2     0.7          6.5       prbempai
Columbus Traditional                                 723    10.2    10.2     0.0         -0.1       prbempai

Detroit                                              426    14.6    11.2     3.4         30.4       prbempai

Oklahoma City                                        511    13.3     9.8     3.5         35.9       prbempai

Portland                                             610    14.3     7.7     6.7 **      87.3       prbempai
