                                    National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies

                                                    Appendix Table B.1

                                    Welfare, Employment, and Health Care Coverage Status
                                  for Respondents and All Children at the End of Two Years

Site and Program                          Program    Control Difference
                                            Group      Group   (Impact)

Atlanta Labor Force Attachment
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     59.9     64.8     -4.9 **     JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                               9.4     11.3     -1.9        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          50.5     53.5     -3.0        EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  40.1     35.2      4.9 **
(5)    Employed                              30.0     25.0      5.0 ***    EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    15.6     12.5      3.1 **     EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        14.5     12.5      1.9        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          10.0     10.2     -0.1        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    4.3      3.4      0.9        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        5.7      6.8     -1.1        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                804     1086

Atlanta Human Capital Development
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     61.6     64.8     -3.2        JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              10.7     11.3     -0.6        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          50.9     53.5     -2.6        EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  38.4     35.2      3.2
(5)    Employed                              26.4     25.0      1.4        EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    14.0     12.5      1.5        EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        12.4     12.5     -0.2        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          12.0     10.2      1.8        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    4.1      3.4      0.7        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        7.9      6.8      1.2        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                               1113     1086
                                                                    (continued)


                                                    Appendix Table  B.1 (continued)


Site and Program                          Program   Control   Difference
                                            Group     Group     (Impact)
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     42.4     49.1     -6.6 **     JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              15.6     13.9      1.7        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          26.8     35.1     -8.3 ***    EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  57.6     50.9      6.6 **
(5)    Employed                              40.9     37.5      3.4        EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    25.0     23.9      1.1        EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        15.9     13.5      2.3        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          16.7     13.4      3.2        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    9.8      7.4      2.4        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        6.9      6.0      0.8        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                574      584

Grand Rapids Human Capital Development
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     46.6     49.1     -2.5        JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              15.6     13.9      1.7        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          30.9     35.1     -4.2        EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  53.4     50.9      2.5
(5)    Employed                              37.5     37.5      0.0        EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    22.8     23.9     -1.1        EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        14.6     13.5      1.1        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          16.0     13.4      2.5        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    9.9      7.4      2.5        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        6.1      6.0      0.0        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                574      584
                                                                    (continued)


                                                    Appendix Table  B.1 (continued)

Site and Program                          Program   Control  Difference
                                            Group     Group    (Impact)
Riverside Labor Force Attachment
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     60.2     69.0     -8.8 ***    JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              18.1     16.4      1.7        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          42.1     52.6    -10.5 ***    EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  39.8     31.0      8.8 ***
(5)    Employed                              24.4     19.0      5.4 ***    EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    13.2      9.9      3.3 **     EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        11.3      9.1      2.1        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          15.4     12.0      3.4 **     EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    7.4      5.8      1.6        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        8.0      6.2      1.8        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                564     1114

Riverside Human Capital Development
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     68.0     73.6     -5.6 **     JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              17.3     14.3      3.0        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          50.8     59.4     -8.6 ***    EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  32.0     26.4      5.6 **
(5)    Employed                              19.6     14.2      5.4 **     EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                     9.5      6.2      3.3 *      EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        10.2      8.0      2.2        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          12.3     12.2      0.2        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    5.8      5.6      0.2        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        6.6      6.6      0.0        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                621      729
                                                                    (continued)



                                                    Appendix Table  B.1 (continued)




Site and Program                          Program   Control Difference
                                            Group     Group   (Impact)
Columbus Integrated
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     43.7     56.7    -13.0 ***    JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                               9.7      9.7      0.0        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          34.0     47.0    -13.0 ***    EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  56.3     43.3     13.0 ***
(5)    Employed                              42.2     30.9     11.3 ***    EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    21.9     17.4      4.6        EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        20.2     13.5      6.7 **     EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          14.1     12.4      1.7        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    8.1      6.8      1.4        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        6.0      5.6      0.4        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                371      357

Columbus Traditional
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     54.2     56.7     -2.5        JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              12.9      9.7      3.2        EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          41.3     47.0     -5.7        EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  45.8     43.3      2.5
(5)    Employed                              33.1     30.9      2.2        EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    20.4     17.4      3.0        EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        12.7     13.5     -0.8        EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          12.7     12.4      0.3        EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    7.3      6.8      0.5        EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        5.4      5.6     -0.2        EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                366      357
                                                                    (continued)



                                                    Appendix Table B.1 (continued)




Site and Program                          Program   Control  Difference
                                            Group     Group     (Impact)
Detroit
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     65.3     67.6     -2.3       JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                              18.8     15.6      3.2       EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          46.5     52.0     -5.5       EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  34.7     32.4      2.3
(5)    Employed                              24.8     18.5      6.2       EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    16.1     11.2      4.8       EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                         8.7      7.3      1.4       EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          10.0     13.9     -3.9       EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    6.4      9.5     -3.1       EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        3.6      4.4     -0.8       EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                210      216

Oklahoma City
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     33.7     41.1     -7.4 *     JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                               7.3      6.3      1.0       EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          26.4     34.8     -8.4 **    EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  66.3     58.9      7.4 *
(5)    Employed                              41.4     42.0     -0.6       EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    14.0     22.1     -8.1 **    EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        27.4     19.9      7.5 **    EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          24.8     16.9      7.9 **    EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    8.9      4.4      4.5 **    EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                       16.0     12.6      3.4       EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                259      252
                                                                    (continued)




                                                    Appendix Table B.1 (continued)


Site and Program                          Program   Control  Difference
                                            Group     Group    (Impact)
Portland
(1)On AFDC: has Medicaid                     43.7     57.7    -14.0 ***   JAFDCYN1
(2)    Employed                               8.1      8.2     -0.1       EORYADRY
(3)    Not employed                          35.6     49.5    -13.9 ***   EORNADRY

(4)Off AFDC                                  56.3     42.3     14.0 ***
(5)    Employed                              42.0     26.6     15.4 ***   EORYADRN
(6)       Health coverage                    27.3     18.9      8.4 **    EOYADNSC
(7)       No coverage                        14.7      7.7      7.0 **    EOYNOSCH
(8)    Not employed                          14.3     15.7     -1.4       EORNADRN
(9)        Health coverage                    9.5      9.0      0.5       EONADNSC
(10)       No coverage                        4.8      6.7     -1.9       EONNOSCH

   Sample size                                297      313


