                                       National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies

                                                          Table 5.4

                                          Program Impacts on Full-Time Employment in Year 2

                                                 Sample Program Control  Difference  Percentage
Site and Program                                   Size   Group   Group    (Impact)   Change (%)

                                                                    A. For All Respondents
Employed full-time  in
all 12 months in year 2 (%)

Atlanta Labor Force Attachment                      1890    14.2    14.4    -0.2         -1.4   ftpayy2
Atlanta Human Capital Development                   2199    13.0    14.4    -1.4         -9.8   ftpayy2

Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment                 1158    19.6    18.8     0.8          4.2   ftpayy2
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development              1158    16.4    18.8    -2.5        -13.1   ftpayy2

Riverside Labor Force Attachment                    1678    15.9    10.1     5.8 ***     57.8   ftpayy2
  Lacked high school diploma or basic skills        1012    13.2     7.6     5.6 ***     73.0   ftpayy2
Riverside Human Capital Development                 1350    10.2     7.6     2.6         33.9   ftpayy2

Columbus Integrated                                  728    19.6    18.4     1.3          7.0   ftpayy2
Columbus Traditional                                 723    18.5    18.4     0.1          0.6   ftpayy2

Detroit                                              426    12.5    12.4     0.1          0.6   ftpayy2

Oklahoma City                                        511    18.1    16.7     1.4          8.2   ftpayy2

Portland                                             610    16.2    15.3     0.9          5.9   ftpayy2
