                                       National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies

                                                          Table 9.6

                            Program Impacts on Subsidized Child Care Use While Employed During Follow-Up Period
                                        for All Sample Members and for Those Who Used Paid Care

                                                  Sample  Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program                                    Size    Group   Group  (Impact)   Change (%)

                                                            A. For All Sample Members
Used subsidized child care for most recent job (%)

Atlanta Labor Force Attachment                      1890     8.8     2.6     6.2 ***    237.9       nopktcc
Atlanta Human Capital Development                   2199     5.5     2.6     2.9 ***    111.7       nopktcc

Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment                 1158     2.1     0.6     1.4 *      231.0       nopktcc
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development              1158     2.6     0.6     1.9 **     311.3       nopktcc

Riverside Labor Force Attachment                    1678     3.8     1.5     2.4 ***    158.3       nopktcc
  Lacked high school diploma or basic skills        1012     3.3     0.7     2.7 ***    407.7       nopktcc
Riverside Human Capital Development                 1350     1.4     0.7     0.8        119.9       nopktcc

Columbus Integrated                                  728     1.9     3.8    -1.9        -50.3       nopktcc
Columbus Traditional                                 723     3.7     3.8    -0.1         -3.3       nopktcc

Detroit                                              426     3.1     0.7     2.4 *      360.5       nopktcc

Oklahoma City                                        511     5.5     5.0     0.5          9.2       nopktcc

Portland                                             610     9.1     3.7     5.4 **     147.3       nopktcc





























